<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for THE POLITICIZER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoliticizer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoliticizer.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on politics and society from the internet generation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:16:24 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SIEFF: On California Part 3: The Governorship by Casey Hound</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/13/sieff-on-california-part-3-the-governorship/comment-page-1/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Hound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3850#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>Accurate, concise, poignant, and imperative. This is a unique opportunity for the most experienced and most knowlegeable true patriot to take the reins of state, with nothing personal to gain or lose, and to guide the public cart up and out of the ditch in which it is stuck. The ultimate swan song, a final chance to be an icon as well as a legend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accurate, concise, poignant, and imperative. This is a unique opportunity for the most experienced and most knowlegeable true patriot to take the reins of state, with nothing personal to gain or lose, and to guide the public cart up and out of the ditch in which it is stuck. The ultimate swan song, a final chance to be an icon as well as a legend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sieff: On California by SIEFF: On California Part 3: The Governorship&#160;&#124;&#160;THE POLITICIZER</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2009/10/02/sieff-on-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7876</link>
		<dc:creator>SIEFF: On California Part 3: The Governorship&#160;&#124;&#160;THE POLITICIZER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=1690#comment-7876</guid>
		<description>[...] the state constitution and rectify the many flaws that have been festering within it for decades. While I don’t think constitutional reform can reshape the social attitudes that produce, and would..., I also don’t think the likely impermanence of reform is grounds to reject it altogether. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the state constitution and rectify the many flaws that have been festering within it for decades. While I don’t think constitutional reform can reshape the social attitudes that produce, and would&#8230;, I also don’t think the likely impermanence of reform is grounds to reject it altogether. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BARON: What Progressive Strategy? by Foolish</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/07/baron-what-progressive-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-7875</link>
		<dc:creator>Foolish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3807#comment-7875</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about you, but that doesn&#039;t sound like idealism to me.

From a pragmatic perspective, we&#039;re going to lose either way.

So why not go down fighting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but that doesn&#8217;t sound like idealism to me.</p>
<p>From a pragmatic perspective, we&#8217;re going to lose either way.</p>
<p>So why not go down fighting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOLDIN: The Broken Record of Tort Reform by Alec Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2009/10/24/goldin-the-broken-record-of-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7874</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=1916#comment-7874</guid>
		<description>Obama didn&#039;t make concessions to reach across the aisle. He made them because he had no choice - the people didn&#039;t want what he was pushing. If you think for a second that Obama is interested in bipartisanship, you&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama didn&#8217;t make concessions to reach across the aisle. He made them because he had no choice &#8211; the people didn&#8217;t want what he was pushing. If you think for a second that Obama is interested in bipartisanship, you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROGERS: But Is It Inevitable? by yoda</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/04/rogers-but-is-it-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>yoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3802#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>noah, don&#039;t be so sure of others your age as you are of yourself.  many in my generation ferociously promoted free love and communal living.  once they had their own daughters, their minds became closed to such a &quot;new way&quot; that focuses only on personal belief and ignores traditional wisdom garnered over hundreds of generations before them.  your&#039;s is not the first generation to suggest that the old ways are stupid, bigoted, not intellectually defendable.  examine the quote above from MLK.  he was a very wise man.  culture&#039;s rarely change as quickly as one generation.  the changes that occurred in the last half of the 20th century and have now been accepted do not mean the pace of that change will continue.  you can&#039;t predict the future, you can only wonder about it.  that is what conor is doing.

here&#039;s my quote - &quot;a broad mind and a narrow waist change places as you grow older&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noah, don&#8217;t be so sure of others your age as you are of yourself.  many in my generation ferociously promoted free love and communal living.  once they had their own daughters, their minds became closed to such a &#8220;new way&#8221; that focuses only on personal belief and ignores traditional wisdom garnered over hundreds of generations before them.  your&#8217;s is not the first generation to suggest that the old ways are stupid, bigoted, not intellectually defendable.  examine the quote above from MLK.  he was a very wise man.  culture&#8217;s rarely change as quickly as one generation.  the changes that occurred in the last half of the 20th century and have now been accepted do not mean the pace of that change will continue.  you can&#8217;t predict the future, you can only wonder about it.  that is what conor is doing.</p>
<p>here&#8217;s my quote &#8211; &#8220;a broad mind and a narrow waist change places as you grow older&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NEAL: Profile in Courage &#8211; Senator Jim Bunning by Tim</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/03/neal-profile-in-courage-senator-jim-bunning/comment-page-1/#comment-7869</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3780#comment-7869</guid>
		<description>I hesitate to say this, but this is perhaps the most profound blog I&#039;ve ever read.

The deficit is not about numbers.  The debt is beyond numbers.  It is an intergenerational moral problem beyond any fiscal situation we&#039;ve ever faced.

Rather than face it with the realism that we are in over our skis--that we face an unsolvable problem, fiscally, politically, and really, that we can never solve with our current attitude--we continue to fund a &quot;reality&quot; that is utterly unsustainable.

We have a tough choice to make.  We can either realize that we are on an utterly unsustainable path, cut spending to a sustainable limit, and bicker about the final details, or we can continue to argue while we maintain an unsustainable path whereby no amount of productivity, no solution, and no &quot;reality&quot; can ever drag us from the hole we&#039;ve created, as human beings and citizens of the United States.

Our generation has absolutely no hope if we do not solve this problem.  The next world superpower will either laugh at the arrogance that has become the U.S. national debt, or envy us for the political fortitude that solves this terrible and difficult political problem.

Rather than bicker about the details, my view is that we do our best to solve this problem today instead of tomorrow.  Unfortunately, the political will resides with the ability to push this on further generations, who will find this problem even more agonizing that we do.  It is disgusting to me that we cry about unemployment, entitlement, and expected benefits while we continue to underfund this liability.  Regardless, my intuition suggests that my generation will continue to ignore this problem, and in doing so, will make the United States the laughing stock of the world that lived within its means for long enough to surpass us.

We have tough decisions to make....and right now, at this instant, we will decide.  I hope we do so carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hesitate to say this, but this is perhaps the most profound blog I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
<p>The deficit is not about numbers.  The debt is beyond numbers.  It is an intergenerational moral problem beyond any fiscal situation we&#8217;ve ever faced.</p>
<p>Rather than face it with the realism that we are in over our skis&#8211;that we face an unsolvable problem, fiscally, politically, and really, that we can never solve with our current attitude&#8211;we continue to fund a &#8220;reality&#8221; that is utterly unsustainable.</p>
<p>We have a tough choice to make.  We can either realize that we are on an utterly unsustainable path, cut spending to a sustainable limit, and bicker about the final details, or we can continue to argue while we maintain an unsustainable path whereby no amount of productivity, no solution, and no &#8220;reality&#8221; can ever drag us from the hole we&#8217;ve created, as human beings and citizens of the United States.</p>
<p>Our generation has absolutely no hope if we do not solve this problem.  The next world superpower will either laugh at the arrogance that has become the U.S. national debt, or envy us for the political fortitude that solves this terrible and difficult political problem.</p>
<p>Rather than bicker about the details, my view is that we do our best to solve this problem today instead of tomorrow.  Unfortunately, the political will resides with the ability to push this on further generations, who will find this problem even more agonizing that we do.  It is disgusting to me that we cry about unemployment, entitlement, and expected benefits while we continue to underfund this liability.  Regardless, my intuition suggests that my generation will continue to ignore this problem, and in doing so, will make the United States the laughing stock of the world that lived within its means for long enough to surpass us.</p>
<p>We have tough decisions to make&#8230;.and right now, at this instant, we will decide.  I hope we do so carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOLDIN: The Broken Record of Tort Reform by Tim</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2009/10/24/goldin-the-broken-record-of-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7868</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=1916#comment-7868</guid>
		<description>Calculations of opportunity cost are extremely difficult.  The .5% illustrates this.  Anyone with a lick of common sense realizes that this is nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calculations of opportunity cost are extremely difficult.  The .5% illustrates this.  Anyone with a lick of common sense realizes that this is nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOLDIN: The Broken Record of Tort Reform by Alex Livingston</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2009/10/24/goldin-the-broken-record-of-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7866</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=1916#comment-7866</guid>
		<description>The American people somehow act as if &quot;bipartisanship&quot; once existed, that there was this golden age of politics. This just simply isn&#039;t the case. I applaud the president for truly making concessions, we have dropped/added so many items to the democratic health care agenda in an attempt to &quot;reach across the aisle&quot; i.e Dropping the public option etc. 

This president, truly put bipartisanship at the top of his agenda; the result- a major loss of political capital, and a public sick of the initiative. 

Your comments on tort reform are enlightening, this is a good article.

So much stale rhetoric is being thrown around. 

Thank you for setting some of the facts straight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American people somehow act as if &#8220;bipartisanship&#8221; once existed, that there was this golden age of politics. This just simply isn&#8217;t the case. I applaud the president for truly making concessions, we have dropped/added so many items to the democratic health care agenda in an attempt to &#8220;reach across the aisle&#8221; i.e Dropping the public option etc. </p>
<p>This president, truly put bipartisanship at the top of his agenda; the result- a major loss of political capital, and a public sick of the initiative. </p>
<p>Your comments on tort reform are enlightening, this is a good article.</p>
<p>So much stale rhetoric is being thrown around. </p>
<p>Thank you for setting some of the facts straight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NEAL: Profile in Courage &#8211; Senator Jim Bunning by Amos</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/03/neal-profile-in-courage-senator-jim-bunning/comment-page-1/#comment-7865</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3780#comment-7865</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that spending on an extension of unemployment benefits in an economic crises is a larger emergency than a preemptive war, considering that the former provides sustenance for thousands of Americans who need it the most. There lies the ideological differnce between you and I.

Regardless Sen Bunning made a fool of himself and added to the, as Kevin so  eloquently put it, the clusterf*ck that is congress right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that spending on an extension of unemployment benefits in an economic crises is a larger emergency than a preemptive war, considering that the former provides sustenance for thousands of Americans who need it the most. There lies the ideological differnce between you and I.</p>
<p>Regardless Sen Bunning made a fool of himself and added to the, as Kevin so  eloquently put it, the clusterf*ck that is congress right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROGERS: Obama&#8217;s Vote of Confidence &#8211; America&#8217;s First by Kathleen McCaffrey</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/2010/03/09/rogers-obamas-vote-of-confidence-americas-first-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen McCaffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=3831#comment-7864</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad we have you, and not the myriad of polls that suggest otherwise, to inform us. Thank you, Blue Dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad we have you, and not the myriad of polls that suggest otherwise, to inform us. Thank you, Blue Dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
