SASSO: The Political Court
James Sasso, Associate Editor
It is troubling that some of the justices seem to have already declared their support for certain cases that are to come before the court. Justice Breyer sidestepped a question about whether or not Justices Thomas or Alito make up their minds for those cases that are obvious fights between differing ideologies, even before they read or hear one argument in the case. Justice Thomas, with his disdain for asking questions during testimony and his wife’s involvement with the Tea Party (not to mention his personal friendship with a major benefactor of the Tea Party), raises many questions about the integrity of certain members of the bench. Do the justices actually address the issues at hand or merely couch their ideologies within veiled explanations of constitutionality?
STROSTER: WBC is Winning (For Now)
The Supreme Court upheld the right of the Westboro Baptist Church to denigrate America’s fighting men and women. This is a victory for freedom of speech and not a victory for the hate-group. In fact, their judicial win may sow the seeds of their own demise — if society would start ignoring them.
PANDYA: Kagan on the Court, What Will Change?
Om Pandya, Columnist
Monday marked Elena Kagan’s first day on the Supreme Court. Despite never being a judge, her role as solicitor general and as a clerk more than prepared her for what she is to face. Her presence definitely will have a huge impact on the Court, so much so that Democrats are calling her the “intellectual counterweight” to Justices Roberts and Scalia. But because she was never a judge, her judicial philosophy is unknown and possibly incomplete. So where will Kagan pull the court?
HOLLINSHEAD: Sizing up Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Kevin Hollinshead, Columnist
On Monday, as the confirmation hearing of Supreme Court hopeful Elena Kagan began, the existing Court quietly issued two relatively significant decisions.
LIFSON: The Impending Confirmation Mess
Matthew Lifson, Columnist
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is about to take a punishing political beating from Republicans – and she may deserve it.
LIFSON: The Supreme Court Will Legalize Gay Marriage
As pundits guess who President Obama will nominate to replace retiring Justice Stevens, the issue of gay marriage is never far-removed from the conversation. The stakes are high because Ted Olsen and David Boies, former adversaries during the controversial Bush v. Gore case that stifled the Florida recount, have forged an unlikely partnership almost certain to bring Perry v. Schwarzenegger, their challenge to Proposition 8, before the Supreme Court within the next two years. But what few liberals or conservatives understand is that Justice Kennedy, the court’s swing vote, has already decided that legalizing gay marriage will be his legacy.
McCAFFREY: Summer of Stevens
Kathleen McCaffrey, Libertarian Republican
Justice John Paul Stevens resigned at an opportune time for Republicans. Even if he will be replaced by a liberal, the circus is coming to DC this summer.
CUEVAS: Separate Isn’t Equal
Jesse-Justin Cuevas, Liberal
Theodore Olson and David Boies are challenging Proposition 8 as a civil rights issue in front of the Supreme Court in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, and they aren’t saying anything new. Or so they say.
PHILLIPS: Campaign Finance and Corporate Money
Where is the line between free speech and corporate interference in elections?
