Peter Fulham, Columnist
Ideology: Democrat | Writing From: College of the Holy Cross (MA)
Ralph Anthony Webb Frietas was killed in Iraq last week. A sergeant and a native of Detroit, he was 23. In the last week of November, three American soldiers died in the Iraq War. Briand T. Williams, of Sparks, Georgia, was among them. He died of gunshot wounds after insurgents attacked his unit in Numaniyah. He was 25.
These fatalities remind us that tragic loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan continues as the nation enters the holidays. And once again, the profound contrast between the horror of our troops’ deployment and the serenity of the home front presents us with a familiar experience. The modest joys of Christmas compel us to turn our thoughts to those who cannot share them and to the pain of war.
I’ve always thought it was telling that certain Christmas songs never seem to expire. Has there ever been a year when we have not heard Bing Crosby bellowing over the radio to American troops in a 1943 rendition of “I’ll Be Home For Christmas”? The holidays help us to seek out nostalgia for a moment in American history when the sadness of a soldier’s absence was tempered by a qualified, collective optimism – a lonely guarantee: “I’ll be home for Christmas / If only in my dreams.”
During this time of the year, it’s safe to say that many of us try, at least, to find temporary relief from our typical concerns. But it is precisely the near-perfect joy of a family Christmas that compels many Americans to contemplate the unknowable Christmas of a soldier.
Last week, as I sat down in a political science class, I overheard one student remark to a friend, “We’re celebrating Christmas early this year.” The friend turned and asked why. “Because my brother’s going back to Iraq,” the girl responded.
Bob Herbert, The New York Times columnist, once quoted the mother of a nineteen-year-old soldier who was killed in 2004 by a bomb in Kirkuk. “I opened the door and I seen the man in the dress greens and I knew. I immediately knew,” she said. “But I thought that if, as long as I didn’t let him in, he couldn’t tell me. And then it – none of that would’ve happened. So he kept saying, ‘Ma’am, I need to come in.’ And I kept telling him, ‘I’m sorry, but you can’t come in.’”
It is easy, perhaps, to sit in an apartment on a high floor on the Upper West Side or in a house in the Boston suburbs and look at the numbers of our two wars with a level head. At the time I am writing this, 4,689 Americans have died in the Iraq War. 1,538 have died in Afghanistan. According to some conservative estimates, over 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died in the conflict so far. But it is awesome to extrapolate, from the pain of one mother, the sum of the sacrifices our two wars have truly required.
Until very recently, I had always subscribed to the eloquent advice E.B. White once offered to readers of a Christmas edition of The New Yorker – that “remembrance is sufficient of the beauty we have seen.”
But no remembrance, no matter how lucid, can bring back a fallen soldier. So this Christmas, we do the only thing we can: offer thanks for the sacrifice of American servicemen and hold close the memory of the many lives cut short, so quietly and suddenly, in order for us to continue on at home in peace.

Well said. No matter what your opinion is on the wars we should be doing all we can to thank the troops.
Last night I watched the end of Curtiz’s “White Christmas” with Bing Crosby and Danny Kaye, a by-now iconic film particularly about soldiers at Christmas.
At the end of the film, during the final number of the “show-within-the-show” staged by BIng and Danny, in the country inn of their esteemed and loved general , and the barn doors open up and the snow is falling in the woods in the background, the camera pans across the audience: the soldiers who came home in formal dress, with their “girls” or wives, all looking resplendent, and the soldiers back in full dress, as the theme “White Christmas” plays in the background. And I realized this was a statement, even then(1954) by the moviemakers: these are the men(supported by their women) who won the war. It was the essential generation. And we had leadership. and we had commitment. And we shared common values. And sacrifice for country hadn’t been tarnished.
And I wished we could summon some of that spirit to win this war(like the one in Iraq–why can’t that be the standard?)to honor the sacrifice of both the fallen, and the still-fighting.
They’re all volunteers, now. Not conscripted. That adds to the poignancy.
Solder, when referring to an American Soldier, is capitalized.
Sweet Tim! If I am remembering correctly, there is also an “i”.
Tim: A quick check revealed there is a debate on that usage “Soldier.” It was decreed by a general a few years ago, but is not universally, or even generally accepted.
It introduces an interesting editorial debate, however. Do we call each and every human being exactly what they want to be called; or in this case what general (General?) would like them to be called; or do we call them what we choose to call them?
SInce it’s not universally, or even very widely accepted, I’ll stick with “soldier.” meaning no disrespect, but not trying to confuse or overwhelm the reader. OK?
I don’t care if it’s generally accepted or not. Just like you, I too have an opinion, I earned the title, and I think it should be capitalized.
Marine is capitalized for the same reason. Why we are not afforded the same respect made no sense to the General and so he corrected the situation.
No, not just like me. It’s my opinion that you can choose to capitalize “soldier”, or not. I disagree with you, and the general. Capitalize all you want. DOn’t force Fulham and me.
What about “airman?”
No disrespect but what I have heard is that Marine is capitalized because it the name of an entity, just like Army and Navy are capitalized. Marines are also referred to as warriors (uncapitalized) just as soldier, sailor, and airman.
Airman would be capitalized if it refers to the rank, such as Airman Smith but when referring to anyone in the Air Force it is simply “airman”
Just what I have heard from some buddies who are serving. I’m a civilian so feel free to disagree, but I think these are the “official” standards of correctness