Noah Baron, Associate Editor
Ideology: Progressive | Writing from: “Fake” America
The Great Backlash started with Nixon’s presidency. He successfully mobilized resentment against those “anti-American” college students who were protesting the war in Vietnam, something which political scientists frequently credit for his victory. It’s rare that you see anyone burning the American flag anymore, or that you see anyone holding posters of Ho Chi Minh or Chairman Mao – yet for the culture warriors, the flag-burning issue is still of great importance; the paranoid accusations of socialism still flow freely from their lips on a regular basis.
The Conservative movement seems unable to move past the backlash mentality – that there are “real Americans” who live in Red States (or who at least vote Republican), and then there are “fake Americans,” those latte-sipping, tofu-loving, freedom-hating pink-commie fascist liberals who shop at Whole Foods and live in New York or other apparently insufficiently American parts of America.
According to those who subscribe to the backlash mentality, the big issues of the day aren’t, say, the economy, or really any things that will have any effect on the day-to-day lives of everyday Americans – no, the most important thing is the supposed culture war with the America-hating liberals and the Democratic Party. In the minds of such people, these un-American Americans (back in the good ol’ days, we had a Congressional committee dedicated to rooting out such people!) are overeducated, out of touch, don’t work with their hands (they probably couldn’t even perform manual labor!); they have expensive taste and sip champagne with one finger in the air; they’re elitists; they don’t go to church – or worse, are outright atheists!; they’re vegetarians (or, God forbid, vegans), promiscuous, and terrified of guns and farm implements; and – worst of all – they’re out to convert our pure children to homosexuality.
Such people are, without a doubt, as obnoxious as they are delusional. On September 11th, 2001, it was New York City – not Jesusland, Arkansas – that was attacked for being a symbol of the infidel America. On September 11th, it was the brave members of New York City’s fire department – most of whom probably voted for Gore – who went into the burning building to save the lives of business executives (most of whom, by the way, probably voted for Bush). Are they somehow less “American” because they live in a blue state or voted for a Democrat? Would it make them less “American” if they were vegan? I don’t recall religion being a requirement of citizenship, either.
Republicans like to point out how frequently they go to Church – as if this activity were all that is required to live a moral life. However, it’s the South that has some of the highest divorce rates in the nation, while America’s very own Sodom, Massachusetts, has the lowest. Not only that – there are plenty of religious liberals (myself included) who live in blue and red states alike, and I suspect there would be many more if they weren’t so appalled by the shameless hypocrisy and bigotry that spews forth from the mouths of so many so-called religious “leaders”.
And by the way: the liberals I know can fix cars; they go to church or synagogue; they grew up or work on farms; they can’t afford (or even like) Gucci or Prada (or even know what those are); they love cheeseburgers and a good steak dinner; they’re in committed monogamous relationships; they’re modest beyond measure. But my entire point here is that these things are not what define them as Americans. What makes them Americans is, foremost, their birthright, but also their boundless generosity, their ingenuity, and their work ethic.
When people like Ann Coulter accuse liberals of being “treasonous” or advise conservatives not to speak to them, they feed into the delusional culture war mentality – a mentality in which liberals are not people with simply a different point of view: they’re actually the enemy; a mentality where the position of Christians in America today is somehow analogous to that of the Jews in Germany on the eve of the Holocaust; a mentality where free speech is believed to protect only those who don’t offend their holier-than-thou sensibilities.
To those who doubt that such sentiments exist, we really need only to point to the scions of the Conservative movement – or even the so-called moderates within the party. It was the McCain campaign which referred to the “real” Virginia, which of course would be voting Republican; it was Sarah Palin who referred to the “pro-America areas of the country”, which of course would be voting for her ticket. That such people can rise to the highest levels of the Republican Party is quite frankly almost as profoundly offensive as what their comments imply.

Noah, this article is your own rampage on the Republican party. As a liberal aren’t you supposed to be accepting and not affected by rednecks and a woman has no education…because we are “ignorant”. Why trouble yourself with attacking our patriotism when you won’t even fly a flag on Independence Day?
Noah,
You say conservatives are ignorant for thinking that liberals are tofu-loving latte-drinking upper class people…
Quite honestly, the entire premise of your argument, that conservatives think that Democrats are all Starbucks/Prius/organic types is ignorant in and of itself.
McCain/Palin may have differentiated “real Virginia” and thus insinuated “fake Virginia” – and commented on “real America” thus insinuating fake America… but I think it’s quite obvious they are referring to the old styles of living vs. new styles of living, rather than saying parts of America are “anti-American”
They quite obvious refer to Dan Rather-type reporters when they talk about Anti-American Press. Just as you view the denial of rights to LGBT people as something that is anti-american, there are people who legitimately believe that Obama’s proposals are “anti-American” and are not the American way of doing things.
I happen to believe that government-run programs are AGAINST the way America does things, and thus, one could call them anti-American.
I just find it ironic that you based an entire article about people making generalizations about liberals as ignorant and wrong, by making a generalization about republicans/conservatives.
I never once said that this was true of all Republicans, or even of all Conservatives: this article is addressed to those who espouse these viewpoints, people, for example, like Colin, who assume that, because I’m a progressive, I won’t fly the American flag.
Both of you have clearly missed my point. Unlike you, Conor, I’ve never said that the people who disagree with me are “anti-America” or “hate America” or are “unAmerican” or are not “real Americans” — I find such talk to be quite frankly offensive. That’s what is at issue here.
If certain Republicans or conservatives (the people I termed “culture warriors”) want to insist on believing that I want to destroy America, or that I “hate America”, that’s something for them to resolve with their psychologists — but when you bring that out into the public sphere, that’s another matter. The reality is that dismissing certain viewpoints as “unAmerican” simply because you disagree with them goes way beyond merely being unconstructive: it’s unacceptable. If you think someone’s belief is unfair, or unfounded, or wrong-minded, say that — but to dare to say that someone is unAmerican because they simply believe or live differently than you do; to claim that only by living and believing as you do can you be a “real American” — *that* is unAmerican.
And by the way, Colin, if I had my own house, I’d fly the flag every day. I happen to be a patriotic American, and my progressive beliefs in no way conflict with that — and I furthermore find it both obnoxious and offensive that you’d imply that they might.
Noah, what is progressive about not flying a flag? Hmmmmm, if you take a page from your European counterparts that liberals look up to so much, you would learn that they love their country. They chant, fly flags, and show their patriotism at all kinds of events. You won’t even fly a flag on a NATIONAL HOLIDAY that celebrates OUR NATION’S INDEPENDENCE.
Think about that “progressive man”….
Noah,
Again, you assume, incorrectly, that I was trying to say that YOU are anti-American.
I specifically mentioned that this was not about different viewpoints on issues, but rather what one views to be AMERICAN. The logical progression that follows is quite simple:
1. America is about liberty and freedom from government.
2. Barack Obama’s plan looks like big government control
3. This is plan goes against American values
4. This plan is anti-American.
*Let me be clear* that is not my view, I was explaining how people make that conclusion.
You likely make the similar logical progression in this way:
1. Equality is an American value
2. People who oppose equality for gays and lesbians oppose equality
3. These people stand against an American value
4. They hold a viewpoint that some could call Un-American.
It’s the same logic, just from a different side. It just so happens, I understand the thought process behind both, yet agree with neither.
Honestly Noah, comments like “Jesusland, Arkansas” don’t do very much to move beyond the very same insults, ignorance and stereotyping that you seek to address in your article. Frankly, lumping people who believe a different religion than you into “Jesusland” is just as intolerant as someone thinking you go to Starbucks because you’re a liberal.
Colin,
You obviously misunderstood what I said. Please reread my comment and you’ll understand that I said that I’d fly the American flag every day, because I love my country. Love of country has nothing to do with political affiliation, but apparently you believe that it does, since you insist on believing that I don’t love my country because I’m a progressive.
Conor,
My comments about Jesusland, Arkansas were tongue-in-cheek. Obviously, I don’t believe that every Republican is a Christian Fundamentalist, nor do I believe that everyone in the South is one either.
Furthermore, I never lumped anyone who has a different religions than I do into “Jesusland”. I was referring to a generic, made-up location — not to any specific group of people. Please don’t put words in my mouth.
Noah,
I was addressing the young liberals as a whole. The 20-40 year old generation. Many, if not most, public high schools no longer say the Pledge of Allegiance before games, events, class. This to most further right conservatives is considered, Anti-American…to some degree it is, to some degree it’s silly to argue about. I know my elementary school used to do it before class but recently my friend asked me to recite the Pledge and I had forgotten half the words. Should I be stoned for not knowing the pledge? No, but I should say it enough to at least be able to recite it. Once again, that prior comment was meant to be less at you and more towards other liberals.
Oh, and southern jokes are getting old. Try Wichita, Kansas for once or somewhere else. You would be surprised how few southerners are not going to beat you with the Bible.
Colin,
I’m glad you clarified that for me, because all the “you”s in your previous comment left me under the impression that you were referring to me.
Noah,
It was just for emphasis.
Of course.
Regardless, you continue to prove my point — rather than seeing liberals as individuals, you see us instead as this group of people who hate America so much that we won’t say the pledge of allegiance. And, again, you make these allegations without any evidence that what you say is true.
Wait…
I’m a vegetarian, I really love good coffee and champagne (but not at the same time), I think it would be fun to burn an American flag (just because I can), and I really do want to convert your kids to homosexuality.
Is that bad?
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tsegel/2005/ts_09191.shtml
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/09/03/pledge_question_stirs_up_town_meeting/
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/25/us/bush-intensifies-debate-on-pledge-asking-why-it-so-upsets-dukakis.html
I could keep posting.
Those are just articles about the banning of the Pledge in schools. By…no other than Liberals.
And rather than seeing conservatives as individuals we are all Bible stomping, hippy hating, sweet tea drinking, and illiterate…I understand completely
Actually, Colin, I don’t see all conservatives that way.
That’s why you clumped us into, “Jesusland, Arkansas” and people who only view you political affliation as, “atheists!; they’re vegetarians (or, God forbid, vegans), promiscuous, and terrified of guns and farm implements; and – worst of all – they’re out to convert our pure children to homosexuality.”
We can all see who you are trying to profile. You didn’t hide it well. Yes, this generation of Republicans still complains about hippies, and gun control. Because truthfully…from experience…hippies really don’t do much but complain and talk; they take no action or attempt to do more than protest to further their agenda.
“I don’t see all conservatives that way.” Noah, really you could have gotten free by saying I don’t see conservatives that way at all. Therefore I am taking an educated guess that you are excluding you Republican friends.
Colin, I already explained that I used “Jesusland, Arkansas” tongue-in-cheek as a generic placename. I didn’t mean it seriously, and I didn’t use it to “clump” anyone into anything.
Also, Colin, if you’d bothered to read my past articles, you’d notice that I’m very much in favor of gun rights.
Lastly, as for what I said previously, you’re just picking at my words. The reason I didn’t say “I don’t see any conservatives that way” is because some conservatives *are* that way.
Noah, you’re basically right, but Hannity, Coulter, and O’Reilly aren’t doing this “culture war” thing just because they feel compelled to, they’re also doing it for publicity and money. Half of the outrageous stuff Ann Coulter says she says to sell books and publicity (and for the sake of humor, in many cases).
I guess it’s okay to be concerned about social decline (I’m hesitant because those kinds of people are just busybodies), but the way that the extremes of the continuum deal with it is all wrong. Basically, all they do is just tell people that doing X is wrong, because…….because. Perhaps God told them. Or they do it by trying to make the activity in question illegal. Taking the specificity out of the term “Prohibitionism”, that has often done more harm than good in the long term.
Noah,
I enjoyed the article but I think you offer an incomplete description of the backlash mentality. The Great Backlash against the culturally liberal, white-dominated anti-war movement was an extension of a greater backlash against black people and the civil rights movement in general. I don’t have a problem with anything you wrote, I just think it’s important to consider race in this context.