<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CARPENTER: Legalize it, Tax it, Reap the Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on politics and society from the internet generation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:15:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpernell</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>mpernell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>Emma, great article. Even though decriminalizing marijuana will technically not make it legal, I think it is the first step to get people comfortable with the idea of an illegal drug being legal. There is such a stigma surrounding marijuana, so slowly changing a few laws at a time will make it easier in the long run to eventually sell it legally and to tax it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma, great article. Even though decriminalizing marijuana will technically not make it legal, I think it is the first step to get people comfortable with the idea of an illegal drug being legal. There is such a stigma surrounding marijuana, so slowly changing a few laws at a time will make it easier in the long run to eventually sell it legally and to tax it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Harris</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>Debaters debate the two wars as if Nixon’s civil war on Woodstock Nation didn’t yet run amok. One need not travel to China to find indigenous cultures lacking human rights or to Cuba for political prisoners. America leads the world in percentile behind bars, thanks to ongoing persecution of hippies, radicals, and non-whites under banner of the war on drugs. If we are all about spreading liberty abroad, then why mix the message at home? Peace on the home front would enhance credibility. 

The witch-hunt doctor’s Rx for prison fodder costs dearly, as lives are flushed down expensive tubes. My shaman’s second opinion is that psychoactive plants are God’s gift. As God witnesses (Gen.1:12), its all good. The administration claims it wants to reduce demand for cartel product, but extraditing Marc Emery increases demand. His seeds enable American farmers to steal cartel customers with better product at lower price.

The constitutionality of the CSA (Controlled Substances Act of 1970) is derived from an interstate commerce clause. This clause is invoked to authorize funding outlaws, endangering homeland security, avoiding tax revenue, and throwing good money after bad. Official policy is to eradicate, not tax, the number-one cash crop in the land. America rejected prohibition, but its back. Apparently, SWAT teams don’t need no stinking amendment.

Nixon promised the Schafer Commission would support the criminalization of his enemies, but it didn’t.  No matter, the witch-hunt was on. No amendments can assure due process under an anti-science law without due process itself. Psychology hailed the breakthrough potential of LSD, until the CSA halted all research. Marijuana has no medical use, period.

The RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993) allows Native American Church members to eat peyote, which functions like LSD. A specific church membership should not be prerequisite for Americans to obtain their birthright freedom of religion. Denial of entheogen sacrament to any American, for mediation of communion with his or her maker, precludes the free exercise of religious liberty.

Freedom of speech presupposes freedom of thought. The Constitution doesn’t enumerate any governmental power to embargo diverse states of mind. How and when did government usurp this power to coerce conformity? The Puritans came here to escape coerced conformity. Legislators who would limit cognitive liberty lack jurisdiction. 

Common-law must hold that adults own their bodies. Socrates said to know your self. Statutes should not presume to thwart the intelligent design that molecular keys unlock spiritual doors. Persons who appreciate their own free choice of path in life should tolerate self-exploration for seekers. Americans’ right to the pursuit of happiness is supposed to be inalienable.

Simple majorities in each house could put repeal of the CSA on the president’s desk. The books have ample law on them without the CSA. The usual caveats remain in effect. You are liable for damages when you screw up. Strong medicine requires prescription. Employees can be fired for poor job performance. No harm, no foul; and no excuse, either. Replace the war on drugs with a frugal, constitutional, science-based drugs policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debaters debate the two wars as if Nixon’s civil war on Woodstock Nation didn’t yet run amok. One need not travel to China to find indigenous cultures lacking human rights or to Cuba for political prisoners. America leads the world in percentile behind bars, thanks to ongoing persecution of hippies, radicals, and non-whites under banner of the war on drugs. If we are all about spreading liberty abroad, then why mix the message at home? Peace on the home front would enhance credibility. </p>
<p>The witch-hunt doctor’s Rx for prison fodder costs dearly, as lives are flushed down expensive tubes. My shaman’s second opinion is that psychoactive plants are God’s gift. As God witnesses (Gen.1:12), its all good. The administration claims it wants to reduce demand for cartel product, but extraditing Marc Emery increases demand. His seeds enable American farmers to steal cartel customers with better product at lower price.</p>
<p>The constitutionality of the CSA (Controlled Substances Act of 1970) is derived from an interstate commerce clause. This clause is invoked to authorize funding outlaws, endangering homeland security, avoiding tax revenue, and throwing good money after bad. Official policy is to eradicate, not tax, the number-one cash crop in the land. America rejected prohibition, but its back. Apparently, SWAT teams don’t need no stinking amendment.</p>
<p>Nixon promised the Schafer Commission would support the criminalization of his enemies, but it didn’t.  No matter, the witch-hunt was on. No amendments can assure due process under an anti-science law without due process itself. Psychology hailed the breakthrough potential of LSD, until the CSA halted all research. Marijuana has no medical use, period.</p>
<p>The RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993) allows Native American Church members to eat peyote, which functions like LSD. A specific church membership should not be prerequisite for Americans to obtain their birthright freedom of religion. Denial of entheogen sacrament to any American, for mediation of communion with his or her maker, precludes the free exercise of religious liberty.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech presupposes freedom of thought. The Constitution doesn’t enumerate any governmental power to embargo diverse states of mind. How and when did government usurp this power to coerce conformity? The Puritans came here to escape coerced conformity. Legislators who would limit cognitive liberty lack jurisdiction. </p>
<p>Common-law must hold that adults own their bodies. Socrates said to know your self. Statutes should not presume to thwart the intelligent design that molecular keys unlock spiritual doors. Persons who appreciate their own free choice of path in life should tolerate self-exploration for seekers. Americans’ right to the pursuit of happiness is supposed to be inalienable.</p>
<p>Simple majorities in each house could put repeal of the CSA on the president’s desk. The books have ample law on them without the CSA. The usual caveats remain in effect. You are liable for damages when you screw up. Strong medicine requires prescription. Employees can be fired for poor job performance. No harm, no foul; and no excuse, either. Replace the war on drugs with a frugal, constitutional, science-based drugs policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2478</link>
		<dc:creator>John O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2478</guid>
		<description>I agree with Michele.  Decriminalization of marijuana is a good first step towards disengaging from the War on Drugs.

The War on Drugs has largely been a failure.  We invaded a sovereign nation (Panama) and threw its leader in prison, and we also sent some Special Forces soldiers to help the Colombian police track down and kill Pablo Escobar.  Those actions (two of our few successes, if you can even call them that) have barely made a dent in the drug trade.

Russell Crowe&#039;s character in American Gangster (a New Jersey narcotics detective) remarked that the drug trade employs people: 
&quot;Judges, lawyers, cops, politicians. They stop bringing dope into this country, about a hundred thousand people are gonna be out of a job.&quot;

He was wrong.  The number is probably much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Michele.  Decriminalization of marijuana is a good first step towards disengaging from the War on Drugs.</p>
<p>The War on Drugs has largely been a failure.  We invaded a sovereign nation (Panama) and threw its leader in prison, and we also sent some Special Forces soldiers to help the Colombian police track down and kill Pablo Escobar.  Those actions (two of our few successes, if you can even call them that) have barely made a dent in the drug trade.</p>
<p>Russell Crowe&#8217;s character in American Gangster (a New Jersey narcotics detective) remarked that the drug trade employs people:<br />
&#8220;Judges, lawyers, cops, politicians. They stop bringing dope into this country, about a hundred thousand people are gonna be out of a job.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was wrong.  The number is probably much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Walk</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Walk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>Ian, I could not agree more.

The question is: how exactly would we prevent marijuana from being imported (especially from Canada)? The drug runners have become very efficient at their trade, as evidenced by the proliferation of drugs in this country. We’d need a truly visionary head of the DEA in order for it to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, I could not agree more.</p>
<p>The question is: how exactly would we prevent marijuana from being imported (especially from Canada)? The drug runners have become very efficient at their trade, as evidenced by the proliferation of drugs in this country. We’d need a truly visionary head of the DEA in order for it to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Goldin</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Goldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>Michele, you&#039;re right.  The US shouldn&#039;t allow itself to be a market for illegal drugs from other countries.  But if we could regulate the legal trade of marijuana, it would take a huge stress off of the legal system, law enforcement, and would give the government another source of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele, you&#8217;re right.  The US shouldn&#8217;t allow itself to be a market for illegal drugs from other countries.  But if we could regulate the legal trade of marijuana, it would take a huge stress off of the legal system, law enforcement, and would give the government another source of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Walk</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Walk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>I agree that marijuana-related offenders are unnecessarily clogging our judicial and prison systems, and that decriminalization would be a much better way to deal with this issue.

However, were marijuana to be legalized (decriminalization, as Kathleen said, usually makes possession of small amounts a misdemeanor) we would still need to fight &quot;the War on Drugs&quot; in a way: internationally. Marijuana is still illegal in many countries, and allowing unregulated black-market, crime-ridden marijuana to enter the United States legally would be a huge foreign policy issue. I do think that the &quot;war on drugs&quot; has been largely a failure; however, if marijuana were to be legalized, I would be in favor of a program that stepped up border and port security and really cracked down on the illegal importation of all drugs. Additionally, such a program would insure that all marijuana-related production and trade were benefiting the American economy almost exclusively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that marijuana-related offenders are unnecessarily clogging our judicial and prison systems, and that decriminalization would be a much better way to deal with this issue.</p>
<p>However, were marijuana to be legalized (decriminalization, as Kathleen said, usually makes possession of small amounts a misdemeanor) we would still need to fight &#8220;the War on Drugs&#8221; in a way: internationally. Marijuana is still illegal in many countries, and allowing unregulated black-market, crime-ridden marijuana to enter the United States legally would be a huge foreign policy issue. I do think that the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; has been largely a failure; however, if marijuana were to be legalized, I would be in favor of a program that stepped up border and port security and really cracked down on the illegal importation of all drugs. Additionally, such a program would insure that all marijuana-related production and trade were benefiting the American economy almost exclusively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen McCaffrey</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticizer.com/blog/2009/07/28/carpenter-legalize-it-tax-it-reap-the-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen McCaffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticizer.com/?p=628#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>Emma,
I agree with your article/thesis entirely. Though I think I should point out that decriminalization, as I advocated in my &quot;War on Drugs: An Exit Strategy&quot; article, doesn&#039;t help bring in revenue - it simply stops funding the futile &#039;War on Drugs.&#039; Under decriminalization, drugs are still technically illegal.
I think my favorite ad I saw in California goes, &quot;Headache? Talk to your doctor about prescription marijuana.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma,<br />
I agree with your article/thesis entirely. Though I think I should point out that decriminalization, as I advocated in my &#8220;War on Drugs: An Exit Strategy&#8221; article, doesn&#8217;t help bring in revenue &#8211; it simply stops funding the futile &#8216;War on Drugs.&#8217; Under decriminalization, drugs are still technically illegal.<br />
I think my favorite ad I saw in California goes, &#8220;Headache? Talk to your doctor about prescription marijuana.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
